News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:James Damore and three others end Google suit by shadowgovt on Monday May 11, 2020 @08:53PM (#23149369)
That would have been a great thing for the memo to say.

That's not what the memo said. Instead, the memo claimed women were on average more neurotic.

Re:James Damore and three others end Google suit by afiori on Tuesday May 12, 2020 @04:37AM (#23151782)
Neuroticism is is a personality trait, others are Obsessionality, Psychoticism, Disinhibition, Impulsivity, Rigidity, Alexithymia, Perfectionism, Sensory processing sensitivity, Novelty seeking, Harm avoidance, Self-esteem, Honesty-humility, Agreeableness, Extraversion, Conscientiousness, and Openness to experience.

I guess that a good deal of them are measurably more prevalent in one gender/sex or the other.

Damore point is that if you design a highly competitive system so that Quality A is rewarded but Quality B is ignored you are going to have an imbalanced workplace if women on average have slightly more B and less A than the mean and men the reverse.

The only content of the memo are suggestion on how a workplace could be both fair and more naturally 50/50 by gender.

We should design our systems so that the minuscule differences between men and women are not overly amplified and not abused, not just pretend that those differences do not exist.

Re:James Damore and three others end Google suit by shadowgovt on Tuesday May 12, 2020 @08:48AM (#23153359)
> The only content of the memo are suggestion on how a workplace could be both fair and more naturally 50/50 by gender.

That's two paragraphs of the memo in the middle and the bit at the end. Most of the memo is setting up a case for fundamental differences in gender, strawman depictions of the "morality of Google," a claim that men have a higher drive for status (which is, fundamentally, the sort of thing that a company would be put immediately in violation of Title VII if it agreed with), and a claim that Google's anti-discriminatory practices are discriminatory.