Re:If you overlay all atomic spectra, you get a Planck distr...
by knzhou on Monday May 11, 2020 @02:24PM
(#23145313)
Neat! Still, I wouldn't say the Planck distribution is noticeably better. The reason the other 4 distributions appear to have the peak too low is because they're doing a tradeoff: they do that to better fit the values of the left hand side of the graph.
The Planck fit gets the peak height right, but mainly because it has no chance of fitting the left hand side at all (since it increases much more slowly than the other distributions), so it doesn't even try.
This is why I said it would be better to have actual statistical tests -- we shouldn't have to have this kind of qualitative discussion when it's already a solved problem.
Re:If you overlay all atomic spectra, you get a Planck distr...
by mcnamaratw on Monday May 11, 2020 @03:08PM
(#23145754)
Can you link the discussion on Reddit?
Re:If you overlay all atomic spectra, you get a Planck distr...
by banana_giraffe on Monday May 11, 2020 @03:18PM
(#23145868)
Re:If you overlay all atomic spectra, you get a Planck distr...
by mcnamaratw on Monday May 11, 2020 @04:31PM
(#23146674)
Seemingly multiple people downvoted this. Why??
I fit a few distributions to the data and actually the Planck distribution at 9000K seems to be noticeably better. I did no further statistics and haven't even looked at the fitted parameters for this. Note: I am an earth scientist, not a physicist. https://imgur.com/Qg4ixF2
Edit: More distributions: https://imgur.com/IrF6lsV
Edit: Filtering out sodium and potassium to try to account for some of the low-wavelength counts doesn't seem to help fitting the distributions either: https://imgur.com/dHDUS9Z
You can get the data here: https://physics.nist.gov/PhysRefData/ASD/lines_form.html
And here's the (garbage) code to reproduce my plots: