Re:If you overlay all atomic spectra, you get a Planck distr...
by macawfish on Monday May 11, 2020 @08:46PM
(#23149324)
> [0] The trick works because physicists are mainly interested in remembering right answers, so if your speculations are wrong they will remember only the experiment, and if your speculations are right they will remember both.
This made me smile!
Re:If you overlay all atomic spectra, you get a Planck distr...
by ianai on Monday May 11, 2020 @01:02PM
(#23144340)
Could this be used to hypothesize about the existence or characteristics of new elements?
Re:If you overlay all atomic spectra, you get a Planck distr...
by whatshisface on Monday May 11, 2020 @03:13PM
(#23145810)
Whether or not an element is stable is determined by what goes on in the nucleus - the electrons are like little flies that show up and hang around something thousands of times heavier. Now, there are such things as nuclear spectral lines, which tell us important things about what goes on in the nucleus. One idea the authors might want to pursue would be checking whether or not their chart similarity also happened for nuclear lines.
There is no particular relationship known between these two things. The authors are curious about why the charts look the same. The authors forgot to pull the old trick where you publish your speculation separately from your experimental results[0], so HN is complaining about their speculation.
[0] The trick works because physicists are mainly interested in remembering right answers, so if your speculations are wrong they will remember only the experiment, and if your speculations are right they will remember both.