News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Getting Back to Work by okaram on Sunday May 10, 2020 @03:53PM (#23135563)
Why can’t we wait? I’m not arguing we should, but I’m not sure we can’t.

What I think is that we sorta can and sorta should; we need to figure out the trade-offs, as best as we can, and decide what measures we want to keep for another year (will vary by country/state/city).

Re:Getting Back to Work by BobbyJo on Sunday May 10, 2020 @04:31PM (#23135908)
I think most people would rather take the risk than commit to 12-16 more months for a 'possible' way out, one we have no means of quantifying yet.
Re:Getting Back to Work by sokoloff on Monday May 11, 2020 @04:46AM (#23140104)
Exactly. I have the luxury of some patience here (married and can WFH) and even I’m not excited about forfeiting 1 of my ~50 years of “healthy, active adult lifespan” for limited gain.

If you estimate that the lockdown takes 50% of life enjoyment away and each of us gets 50 healthy years of self-directed adult life, a year of lockdown is equivalent to sapping 1% of total life enjoyment. That’s not exactly the same as 1% increase in population deaths in a year, but it’s comparable IMO.

Re:Getting Back to Work by marcinzm on Sunday May 10, 2020 @07:29PM (#23137289)
Most probably but a non-trivial percentage would rather wait indefinitely. I'm seeing many liberals who equate opening things up to literal human sacrifice for corporate profit.