This was generally my entire college experience. There were a few pockets of fresh air, like my philosophy classes. It was only after graduating that I started to notice people slowly coming around to the idea science is a useful, but not exhaustive tool, for developing ethical frameworks, world views, principles, etc. And the attempts to use it strictly to do so (the pockets of hyper-rational logic out there) leave much to be desired, at least in my opinion. What surprised me most was how often practitioners of science, not just those “for science yarr” types, got caught up in the whole thing.

>>> Science cannot tell us what to live for, or what is good or evil.

Nor can anybody else. At best, a field of study can enumerate multiple, irreconcilable answers to those questions. I'm not saying those fields aren't worthwhile, just that they're equally unsuited to solving problems beyond that scope.