News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The $1,799 MacBook Pro 13 vs. the $650 Acer Swift 3 by generalpass on Saturday May 09, 2020 @12:51PM (#23126255)
I wonder how much money non-upgradable RAM actually saves.
Re:The $1,799 MacBook Pro 13 vs. the $650 Acer Swift 3 by bArray on Saturday May 09, 2020 @12:54PM (#23126294)
Not much. Probably less to do with saving money and more about locking you into a specific amount of RAM. That way you spend the extra schmeckles in the first place rather than upgrading the machine yourself 2 years down the line.
Re:The $1,799 MacBook Pro 13 vs. the $650 Acer Swift 3 by Someone1234 on Saturday May 09, 2020 @12:55PM (#23126297)
It is also space. Non-upgradable ram can be put on when the circuit board is assembled, by robot. Upgradable ram has the socket installed in the same process, but then needs the ram put into the socket by low cost workers.

But as I said, space is likely the biggest reason.

Re:The $1,799 MacBook Pro 13 vs. the $650 Acer Swift 3 by nrp on Saturday May 09, 2020 @01:00PM (#23126344)
In this instance, both laptops use LPDDR4x, which doesn’t exist in stick form. DDR4 SO-DIMM sockets are a challenge to fit though, so most OEMs take the easy path and go with soldered RAM there anyway.
Re:The $1,799 MacBook Pro 13 vs. the $650 Acer Swift 3 by analog31 on Saturday May 09, 2020 @12:54PM (#23126291)
I wonder if it's mainly an issue of finding empty space for it.