2. Yes, he got himself fired. Nobody made him write that, and even after writing it, nobody made him post it on a large mailing list where an entire workforce could read it.
3. You don't think his actions were what caused him to get fired. So whose fault was it, if not his? You're more intent on making a statement against the "outrage mob" than actually acknowledging why doing what Damore did might get you fired at any company.
Again, it's especially telling that you and the people who defend Damore attribute zero fault to the person who actually wrote the memo.
> Again, it's especially telling that you and the people who defend attribute zero fault to the person who actually wrote the memo.
I've been honest and I replied in good faith, and yet you just sidestep and lump me in with some made up group of people whom you say attribute "zero fault" to Damore. You didn't listen to me at all. You didn't even ask me what faults I would attribute to Damore after I denied your perception of what I'm thinking. Why should anyone have a conversation with you?
EDIT: I mistakenly thought your comment was from the person I was having the conversation with.
How am I supposed to take you seriously when you're denying the sheer amount of negative media attention, all the outrage Tweets, and the general sentiment in online discussions like this one that are happening years later?
We can discuss the extent of the outrage mob, but your idea that there's no outrage mob at all is baffling.
> You know who got James Damore fired? Himself.
No, he didn't get himself fired. His employer fired him.
> It's especially telling that you, and people who defend him, attribute zero fault whatsoever to the person who actually wrote the memo.
"Zero fault"? Your telepathy is way off, because I didn't say once that Damore has no fault.
The outrage mob "isn't real", yet you are so quick to dismiss those who think that Damore is defensible.