News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on 4D Toys: how objects bounce and roll in 4D – paper accepted to SIGGRAPH 2020. Parent comment

Re:4D Toys: how objects bounce and roll in 4D – paper accept... by centimeter on Friday May 08, 2020 @06:09PM (#23120094)
Correct me if I'm wrong - I'm just trying to make sure I understand the generality of your statement. 3-bivectors are commonly referred to as the "axis angle" representation, and have an obvious embedding as the lie algebra to the lie group of rotation quaternions. [x,y,z] -> 0+xi+yj+zk -exp-> rotator quaternion.

Does such a thing exist at higher dimensions? I vaguely recall something about having complex numbers for 2D rotation, quaternions for 3D rotation, and octonions for (I'm guessing) 4D rotation, but I'm curious if the loss of associativity with octonions screws with this relationship somehow.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:4D Toys: how objects bounce and roll in 4D – paper accept... by h-cobordism on Friday May 08, 2020 @07:09PM (#23120515)
> Does such a thing exist at higher dimensions?

Yes, everything in your first paragraph extends to any number of dimensions (replacing "quaternion" with "rotor").

> I vaguely recall something about having complex numbers for 2D rotation, quaternions for 3D rotation, and octonions for (I'm guessing) 4D rotation

Bivectors and rotors faithfully represent rotations in any number of dimensions. The octonion product can't, because as you said, it's not associative, but rotations obviously have to compose associatively.

[ Parent | on HN ]