Re:Rebuilding our tech stack for the new facebook.com
by karmakaze on Friday May 08, 2020 @02:13PM
(#23117730)
These views are aligned. A site that's fast and a pleasure to use advances both agendas. It's still a failure.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Rebuilding our tech stack for the new facebook.com
by radicalbyte on Friday May 08, 2020 @03:39PM
(#23118607)
Only if there's competition. The network effect ensures that there is no competition. Leaving us where we currently are.
Re:Rebuilding our tech stack for the new facebook.com
by karmakaze on Friday May 08, 2020 @04:25PM
(#23119026)
Not even, users can just 'not play' (or play less) if the game's no fun.
Re:Rebuilding our tech stack for the new facebook.com
by beagle3 on Friday May 08, 2020 @05:46PM
(#23119862)
There are many users for which it is not fun, but an addiction. I have spoken to lots of people who say about once a month something like "Yeah, facebook is really bad for me, I just waste time and get upset", but they can't stop checking it every hour, and responding to posts that touch them emotionally, in either a good or bad way.
That's by design, of course - it benefits Facebook greatly that its herd is addicted, and unlike people addicted to alcohol, nicotine or other substances - there's not even another supplier they can turn to: It's either feed your addiction or suffer withdrawal symptoms.
And I think the success rate of quitters (as a percentage of those who actually want to quit) is also comparable, at single digit percent.