News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Pentagon official: FCC decision on 5G threatens GPS, nati... by ohazi on Thursday May 07, 2020 @01:20PM (#23105530)
5g uses more power, not less.
Re:Pentagon official: FCC decision on 5G threatens GPS, nati... by danaliv on Thursday May 07, 2020 @01:45PM (#23105817)
I don’t think that was the point of the analogy.

s/more power-efficient/better/

Re:Pentagon official: FCC decision on 5G threatens GPS, nati... by close04 on Thursday May 07, 2020 @02:44PM (#23106601)
> /better/

5G is better. When the vision is finally realized. In the meantime you get a brand new washing machine that costs double, only works when you're next to it, and the spin cycle must be done in the old one. And by the time it's actually better you have to buy a new one anyway.

5G was rushed in a way 3/4G weren't because smartphone sales are slowing down. This is not the usual "there are some hiccups at the beginning" type of thing. As it is today it's rushed and half-baked.

Re:Pentagon official: FCC decision on 5G threatens GPS, nati... by Avamander on Thursday May 07, 2020 @03:08PM (#23106931)
> costs double, only works when you're next to it, and the spin cycle must be done in the old one. And by the time it's actually better you have to buy a new one anyway.

You just described early GPS receivers.

Re:Pentagon official: FCC decision on 5G threatens GPS, nati... by close04 on Thursday May 07, 2020 @03:28PM (#23107153)
Which says a lot. Having a first generation that comes with compromises and caveats is understandable and unavoidable. It still solves a problem where there's nothing else to even attempt it. In this light the current 5G deployment is indeed just a severely compromised one meant to oversell advantages that are nonexistent today and handwave the disadvantages. You'd have seen a more mature 5G deployment in a few years if the smartphone market didn't need a nudge.