Re:IQ is largely a pseudoscientific swindle (2019)
by alexandercrohde on Thursday May 07, 2020 @11:04AM
(#23103806)
Sorry, I don't want to read that whole thing. Is there a linked journal article about IQs of nobel winners?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:IQ is largely a pseudoscientific swindle (2019)
by JamesBarney on Thursday May 07, 2020 @12:08PM
(#23104590)
The article basically says when you look at a 1000 really smart 11 year olds you don't get any Nobel prize winners. Which is a pretty obvious straw man because the base rate of Nobel prize winners is 1 in a million, plus childhoold IQ doesn't perfectly correlate with adult IQ. For instance a group of children with an average IQ of 150 will have an average IQ of 130 as adults.
https://pumpkinperson.com/2015/07/26/anne-roes-study-of-extr...
Basically the average Nobel prize winners have IQ's in the 150's.
Re:IQ is largely a pseudoscientific swindle (2019)
by empath75 on Thursday May 07, 2020 @12:35PM
(#23104908)
There were two future Nobel prize winners that were excluded from the group he studied because they didn't score high enough.
Re:IQ is largely a pseudoscientific swindle (2019)
by JamesBarney on Thursday May 07, 2020 @12:59PM
(#23105243)
Who both also had very high iqs, just not quite high enough at the age of 11 to be included.