News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Ask HN: Is your company sticking to on-premise servers? Why? by lifeisstillgood on Thursday May 07, 2020 @02:43AM (#23100359)
>> Leaves fall from the trees, plants grow, animals graze, trains run, whether or not any human is watching.

Well that solves the age old question about trees falling in forests :-)

Re:Ask HN: Is your company sticking to on-premise servers? Why? by rbanffy on Thursday May 07, 2020 @08:12AM (#23102089)
That's a poorly implemented universe. Unless information propagates, it didn't happen ;-)

You could always fast forward the current state when the first external observer arrives. But I get there are time constraints - you can't just stop the real universe until it converges to a consensual state.

Re:Ask HN: Is your company sticking to on-premise servers? Why? by lifeisstillgood on Friday May 08, 2020 @06:10PM (#23120111)
This does bother me about the whole "likely we are living in the matrix" thing. If we want to design a universe that does not waste a lot of processing power we need to do things like have a speed of light limitation (keep it fairly slow too). But the sensible idea is to only process lazily - don't calculate till the observer observes - but it is very much like a dependency hell.
Re:Ask HN: Is your company sticking to on-premise servers? Why? by m463 on Saturday May 09, 2020 @06:33AM (#23123586)
I think they need to implement a tree tree.

So if a tree falls in a forest and no one is around to hear it, it won't hit the sound code or the display code.