Re:No cookie consent walls, scrolling isn’t consent, says EU...
by ratww on Wednesday May 06, 2020 @01:05PM
(#23093500)
Collecting data and being annoying are entirely optional and a choice made by companies. The law is a still a partial victory for privacy.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:No cookie consent walls, scrolling isn’t consent, says EU...
by cglace on Wednesday May 06, 2020 @02:03PM
(#23094285)
It may be optional but it seems to be the standard rather than the exception.
I just don't see people really caring about their privacy. When given the choice between convenience and privacy people generally choose convenience. As someone who doesn't have a dog in this fight, I just end up annoyed.
Re:No cookie consent walls, scrolling isn’t consent, says EU...
by ratww on Thursday May 07, 2020 @07:02AM
(#23101657)
Just because something is a standard doesn't mean it's right. It also doesn't mean the law shouldn't discourage it.
And just because people don't care doesn't mean a company is automatically allowed to track people.
If the law were followed by the letter and companies weren't using dark patterns or ambiguous marketing-speak to convince people to allow cookies, only people with pro-tracking stances would allow it.