Re:Citing revenue declines, Airbnb cuts 25% of workforce
by playing_colours on Wednesday May 06, 2020 @05:43AM
(#23089294)
Berlin rental costs are capped by law from some time ago, and the numbers are actual.
Re:Citing revenue declines, Airbnb cuts 25% of workforce
by bacr on Wednesday May 06, 2020 @07:21AM
(#23089754)
The point still stands. Rental caps mean it is very difficult to find a place to live in desired neighborhoods. Of course, you can find places outside the ring, but those would have been cheaper anyway!
That’s not to say it isn’t sensible social policy. It is less disruptive to people who have lived there for a long time. But if you move for work, you will have to either pay a lot more than you would have in 2011, or get lucky.
Re:Citing revenue declines, Airbnb cuts 25% of workforce
by fennecfoxen on Wednesday May 06, 2020 @12:23PM
(#23092856)
I would hold that the better social policy is capping the cost of rent by allowing the construction of competitive housing stock. Either alternative is quite harmful: new housing is unattainable, either by defect of price or availability.
Re:Citing revenue declines, Airbnb cuts 25% of workforce
by joyj2nd on Wednesday May 06, 2020 @01:35PM
(#23093893)
Yeah, rent caps worked out in Lisbon extremely well. Not.
Re:Citing revenue declines, Airbnb cuts 25% of workforce
by fennecfoxen on Wednesday May 06, 2020 @12:19PM
(#23092792)
Depends on whether you mean, "there exists someone who pays this", or whether you mean, "as someone looking for housing, you can expect to get the housing, and pay this much." (The part where you can actually obtain this rental falls apart entirely.)
"Cost of living in Munich (one of Germany's most expensive cities) vs. SF.[1] And then Berlin (one of Germany's cheapest cities) vs. SF.[2]" I think these numbers are outdated. Especially Berlins rental and real estate costs are catching up quickly.