News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:2020 Pulitzer Prize Winners by beaner on Tuesday May 05, 2020 @01:46AM (#23076892)
I mean if you already believe that the press is mostly Right in their reporting, it might be difficult to convince you otherwise. But there are so many instances of fake news related to Trump reporting that it's really not inaccurate to call it that.

If literally everything you said was twisted in a way to misrepresent you don't you think you'd get a little tired of it, roll your eyes at it, and shrug it off sometimes too? That's not an absolute defense for doing this exclusively, but he doesn't do this exclusively. He calls it out, then answers.

But this is altogether besides the point of what I was responding to, which is that this kind of talk is existentially dangerous to the press as an institution. You could claim Trump is a liar and a deflector and is doing bad things and says a one-liner instead of justifying, and that would be a fair criticism. But then it would be a danger insofar as it means we have a lack of responsibility and accountability in our leadership, not insofar as it poses a threat to the freedom of the press.

Re:2020 Pulitzer Prize Winners by pm90 on Tuesday May 05, 2020 @03:55AM (#23077571)
> That's not an absolute defense for doing this exclusively, but he doesn't do this exclusively. He calls it out, then answers.

he does not answer shit. He spews nonsense. He does not speak coherently about facts at all.

Re:2020 Pulitzer Prize Winners by beaner on Tuesday May 05, 2020 @05:02AM (#23077982)
That's a tangent we could go down but not really the point of what I'm talking about.
Re:2020 Pulitzer Prize Winners by pm90 on Tuesday May 05, 2020 @10:06AM (#23080124)
Actually it’s not a tangent at all but a core part of the strategy. Flooding the system with Shit as bannon so aptly calls it.