Re:No, I won't read your amateur Covid-19 “research paper”
by D13Fd on Monday May 04, 2020 @11:53AM
(#23069478)
It would be helpful if this linked to the original article/paper to put it in context.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:No, I won't read your amateur Covid-19 “research paper”
by zymhan on Monday May 04, 2020 @11:55AM
(#23069528)
I disagree, this post applies to many, many discussions/dissections/etc about the current pandemic.
The skepticism in general applies even more widely. The point is to make you think harder next time you read an amateur post on COVID.
Re:No, I won't read your amateur Covid-19 “research paper”
by D13Fd on Monday May 04, 2020 @12:24PM
(#23069958)
The post makes a number of claims that I disagree with generally, like the idea that a person who is not a formal expert on a subject has no business offering evidence-based opinions on the subject.
I think a link to the original paper would help me better judge where the author is coming from and whether, in context, he/she is making good points here.