Re:Popcorn Linux
by eliaspro on Sunday May 03, 2020 @04:12PM
(#23061511)
Sounds a bit like a Beowulf Linux cluster from about 20y ago. What's the major difference between the approach of those.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Beowulf had no shared memory abstraction, programs had to be written using message passing, e.g. MPI.
I'm not convinced a shared memory abstraction is a good thing for distribution across machines. Some Beowulf clusters actually had much lower latency interconnects than ethernet, e.g. Quadrics, but we still needed to carefully optimise the traffic. With a shared memory abstraction, such optimisation is out of our hands.
Beowulf was just the idea of making a cluster of cheap commodity hardware using open software, typically not Single System Image.
Re:Popcorn Linux
by nineteen999 on Sunday May 03, 2020 @05:52PM
(#23062150)
Yeah I was thinking this sounds more like MOSIX, but with the added abstraction to handle executing the same code accross different architectures.
Indeed, MOSIX or Kerrighed
http://www.kerrighed.org/wiki/index.php/Main_Page