News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Re: Integrating "safe" languages into OpenBSD? (2017) by cosmojg on Sunday May 03, 2020 @01:48PM (#23060613)
> I disagree with your assertion about it being the most secure general purpose OS but I'm not gonna go there :)

Could you please go there? I'm very curious what the contenders for "most secure general purpose OS" might be.

Re:Re: Integrating "safe" languages into OpenBSD? (2017) by staticassertion on Sunday May 03, 2020 @02:16PM (#23060825)
I think geofft's points go a long way. I think having this conversation would require a lot though - what is "Secure" what is "general purpose". Is OpenBSD even general purpose? Is the base install general purpose? What makes an OS secure?

I think maybe as a "with 0 configuration to the OS/ services" OpenBSD could be a top contender. With "I have practical security challenges to solve and I'm willing to change things in this system" I might choose Linux. If I'm handing a laptop out to an employee or friend, maybe a Chromebook, or even Windows! It's a pretty nuanced discussion that I couldn't do justice to without really caring and feeling that everyone involved in the conversation is equally invested/ coming in with the right attitude, which is impossible on an internet forum.

Re:Re: Integrating "safe" languages into OpenBSD? (2017) by pnako on Sunday May 03, 2020 @08:01PM (#23062936)
Well, there is only one real "general purpose" OS that runs on supercomputers, mainframes, servers, laptops, tablets, mobile and embedded, and that's Linux. So it's also the most secure.