News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:When bad UX is good by rezoner on Saturday May 02, 2020 @03:45PM (#23054360)
Quality pixelart is more expensive than 3D assets. You get all angles and bone based animation from a model while you have to draw every animation frame in every angle manually with 2D approach. On top of that a 3D world brings easier customisation and reusability of assets.
Re:When bad UX is good by pier25 on Saturday May 02, 2020 @05:36PM (#23055129)
OTOH with 3D you have to do a lot of work setting up bones, textures, blend shapes, and whatnot.
Re:When bad UX is good by thebean11 on Sunday May 03, 2020 @01:59AM (#23057163)
Is quality pixel art more expensive than quality 3D assets? I really don't think so.
Re:When bad UX is good by chii on Sunday May 03, 2020 @03:09AM (#23057396)
Poor quality 3D assets still work OK. Poor quality pixel art is very ugly. So if you can only afford poor quality, 3D is much better.