News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Why does `True == False is False` evaluate to False in Py... by tomp on Saturday May 02, 2020 @10:42AM (#23052052)
Literally the only thing you need to know is that * binds tighter than + and - and that * can be omitted. Everything else is obvious - I never used / but fractions instead, exponentiation is also visually indicated, the only counterexample I guess is some made up operations when doing group/ring theory but it’s all clearly explained anyways. Using “clear unambiguous syntax” as in () would actually make all formulas much longer and much less clear.

There are no comments on this comment yet.