News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:ICANN board withholds consent for a change of control of ... by twhitmore on Friday May 01, 2020 @03:42AM (#23039926)
I have found WSJ to carry one-sided articles with little factual basis quite frequently, actually.

Such travesties as: Perfect market theory, Chicago School/ dry economics, ignoring the negative effects of monopolies/ short-term extractive capitalism.

I know they used to be "reputable" but. Today large parts of America are a crumbling trashcan. Where is their acknowledgement of this problem, and how capitalism should solve it?

I would recommend The Economist as a factually-based business & economics subscription.

Re:ICANN board withholds consent for a change of control of ... by sneeze-slayer on Friday May 01, 2020 @11:20AM (#23042871)
I can second The Economist. I find that they also have a pro-business/free market stance, but at least I find that they have reasonable and factual reporting, which I sometimes find lacking with the WSJ.
Re:ICANN board withholds consent for a change of control of ... by ardy42 on Friday May 01, 2020 @03:08PM (#23045462)
> I can second The Economist. I find that they also have a pro-business/free market stance...

To put it lightly. That stance defines it:

https://www.newstatesman.com/culture/books/2019/11/how-econo...

Re:ICANN board withholds consent for a change of control of ... by alteria on Friday May 01, 2020 @06:44PM (#23047296)
Thanks for sharing, fascinating read.