Re:Uber discusses plan to lay off about 20% of employees
by arcticbull on Wednesday April 29, 2020 @06:42PM
(#23025422)
> This must be cheaper and optimal due to scale and algorithms ability to select fitting driver's from a huge pool.
FWIW I did point out why it wouldn't be optimal: insurance can't be pooled and depreciation of the personal vehicle may far outstrip any benefits gained from Uber. If average drivers ran the numbers I think they'd be really disappointed.
FWIW I did point out why it wouldn't be optimal: insurance can't be pooled and depreciation of the personal vehicle may far outstrip any benefits gained from Uber. If average drivers ran the numbers I think they'd be really disappointed.