Also, probably the wrong country to praise a capital G God about, but that's just a cultural thing.
(yeah, everyone says it does since a week ago but data is reported late and it has been showing a downward trend the last few days for many weeks, it's not)
At that point, they could end up in a situation where they experience the same deaths and have crippled their economy for months. Sweden would look very clever under such a scenario.
We will only know what strategies worked the best with benefit of hindsight.
For the vast majority of other countries delaying deaths will mean saving many lives, because of overwhelmed healthcare systems.
In the US, for example, healthcare systems are overloaded in places far from hotspots. If the lockdown had come a day or two later in places that are hotspots it would have been a catastrophe.
Everybody likes to play the numbers and curves games, but don't make it political by deliberately faking it. Like the NY Times or FT curves lately.
Even euromomo.eu changed its curves recently so they do lookh more dramatic. Not backed by the absolute numbers. They suddenly invented 32.000 unaccounted new deaths out of the magicians hat, not telling us were these new numbers came from. Some countries forbid pathologies on COVID-19 cases and forbid classification post-mortem. But this only applies to elderlies dying at home alone. But this would only apply to countries like the US with no healthcare system. Like the New Jersey case of 70 seniors. Everybody else goes to the hospitals.
Suggesting it is the equivalent of a "weak flu season" is an outright lie. And the bit about our immune system being able to fight it off well due to a similarity with the common cold is just something you made up, right?
Around 2k deaths is a common but serious flu, and corona has passed that, and we don't see a peak.
I think the big psychological driver was the situation in Italy and Spain: The overwhelmed hospitals, the localized rationing of certain medical care, and front-line medical workers who were getting sick (and sometimes dying). I guess it turns out that nobody wants to watch their medical system collapse?
> Any public health official who suggested maybe just the most vulnerable be isolated was met with scorn
So how would you imagine this working? Healthy people in their 70s who live in standalone homes might be able to self-isolate. (I know a handful of highly-disciplined people who are planning to remain isolated until we get a vaccine, even if it takes until the fall 2021.) But people who live in multi-generational homes, or who rely on assistance, or who live in apartment buildings probably can't self-isolate. And how would we handle people in assisted living? Do the caregivers "live in" for a month-long shift?
The death rates in the over-70 group are pretty bad (and even healthy people of that age usually have some pre-existing conditions), and the death rates in the over-80 group are ugly. For the population at large, it looks like ~0.2% of NYC is already dead, and ~20% of the population has antibodies. So we'd be looking at something like a 1% fatality rate, which would work out to over 2 million dead nationwide before we reached herd immunity. And that's not counting any long-term damage to survivors from blood clots, oxygen deprivation, or kidney damage (Wuhan is allegedly seeing an uptick in dialysis patients). I don't know how common or serious these complications are at a population level.
> It will be clear in several more months that the Sweden strategy is the only way to minimize total harm and navigate this crisis.
I wish I had a crystal ball, so that I could actually know what worked the best. You seem very certain that Sweden's on the right track. Some Asian countries seem to be focusing on minimizing gatherings, masking, contact tracing and isolation of the infected, which allows them to have a partially functioning economy.
All of these solutions are awful in different ways. I'm just not convinced that the right answer is as clear as you make it out to be, certainly not without a lot more detail about how to successfully isolate people over 70 from an airborne virus.
All very predictable though.
I heard their border was closed, but I think the exceptions make the rule, if there are any
Midsommar is celebrated on the countryside with the family. Get IKEA delivery of foods (available in some US locations), boil a ton of small potatoes and get some wormwood(Swedish:malört) spiced vodka.
Any scientist that had a differing viewpoint was a monster who didn't value human life. Any public health official who suggested maybe just the most vulnerable be isolated was met with scorn and a heap of emotional but illogical arguments.
Look up David Katz [1]. Only Fox News would let him talk until Bill Maher put him on. He's eminently sensible, and he was silenced by the media.
Blanket lockdown (that is, all ages locked down) for this virus has never made sense in Western democracies. China did it because they could, and they have a command economy and a willing populace. The UK knew it didn't make sense from day one, but caved to public pressure. Sweden is still going strong, thank God, as they will be the country that shows the rest of the world how to live with, and ultimately beat, this disease. Norway just let the youngest kids go back to school, smartly, to increase herd immunity with less personal impact.
It will be clear in several more months that the Sweden strategy is the only way to minimize total harm and navigate this crisis.
[1]: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lze-rMYLf2E
[Edit]: Good job HN participants. Way to prove the story correct.