Re:Supreme Court rules Georgia state law annotations not cop...
by henryfjordan on Monday April 27, 2020 @07:44PM
(#23001580)
I suppose she'd be able to sell "official copies" or something akin to that, but no matter what she's still not capturing as much of the value she created if she cannot assert a copyright. There's also nothing in copyright law precluding her from also getting sponsors. If anything, copyright law makes it clearer where everyone stands and so makes connecting writers and sponsors (or employers through a work-for-hire agreement) much easier.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Supreme Court rules Georgia state law annotations not cop...
by zozbot234 on Monday April 27, 2020 @07:47PM
(#23001609)
> she's still not capturing as much of the value she created if she cannot assert a copyright
No one's disputing that. But she's also creating a lot more value at the same time. It's a wash.
Re:Supreme Court rules Georgia state law annotations not cop...
by icebraining on Tuesday April 28, 2020 @04:45AM
(#23005008)
It's not a wash for her, though, which may change her decisions to actually produce the work.