Re:Disney claims anyone using a Twitter hashtag is agreeing ...
by chrisseaton on Monday April 27, 2020 @05:35PM
(#23000369)
Did you know that you can't use copyright to protect an algorithm?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Disney claims anyone using a Twitter hashtag is agreeing ...
by dsl on Monday April 27, 2020 @06:01PM
(#23000621)
But you can copyright the most efficient implementations.
Re:Disney claims anyone using a Twitter hashtag is agreeing ...
by chrisseaton on Monday April 27, 2020 @06:20PM
(#23000792)
You can only copyright the text of the source code, as if it was literature. Write your own source code to implement the same algorithm using the same efficient techniques, and you're fine (as long as it isn't patented.)
Re:Disney claims anyone using a Twitter hashtag is agreeing ...
by FalconSensei on Monday April 27, 2020 @10:57PM
(#23002851)
so... rename the variables?
Re:Disney claims anyone using a Twitter hashtag is agreeing ...
by smnrchrds on Tuesday April 28, 2020 @12:57AM
(#23003530)
On a more serious note, this:
Re:Disney claims anyone using a Twitter hashtag is agreeing ...
by chottocharaii on Tuesday April 28, 2020 @03:36AM
(#23004494)
It depends on the jurisdiction. e.g. Such a thing would not be copyrightable under Australian law. That could be a way around it.
Re:Disney claims anyone using a Twitter hashtag is agreeing ...
by taneq on Tuesday April 28, 2020 @12:24AM
(#23003338)
As mentioned above, some algorithms are so simple that there's only one canonical way to write them. (Take 'looping through an array' for example - in each language there's generally one canonical way to do it.) You could argue that the text of that canonical way is copyrightable.
(It's similar to the early days of heat engines, where a guy called James Pickard managed to patent the crank, preventing other engine manufacturers from using cranks and forcing them to use a sun-and-planet gear arrangement instead: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sun_and_planet_gear )