I translated a simple C program to x86_64 and it was slower

Re:I translated a simple C program to x86_64 and it was slower by igouy on Monday April 27, 2020 @11:24AM (#22996694)

You don't say which graphs you are complaining about, and you don't say why you think some other graphs were useful.

Those graphs show the same as they did in 2013:

Do you mean these:

Do you mean these:

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:I translated a simple C program to x86_64 and it was slower by dependenttypes on Monday April 27, 2020 @11:46AM (#22996945)

I meant the last one. I did say exactly which graph I was complaining about.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:I translated a simple C program to x86_64 and it was slower by igouy on Tuesday April 28, 2020 @10:21AM (#23007228)

So why do you "really wish that they re-added" that graph ?

What problem would that solve for you ?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:I translated a simple C program to x86_64 and it was slower by igouy on Monday April 27, 2020 @12:58PM (#22997609)

What does that graph let you do that you cannot do now?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:I translated a simple C program to x86_64 and it was slower by dependenttypes on Sunday May 03, 2020 @06:05AM (#23058054)

Easily compare in a cute format how a language does against another for a given problem regarding memory usage and time.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:I translated a simple C program to x86_64 and it was slower by igouy on Sunday May 03, 2020 @11:53AM (#23059755)

Not "cute" enough?

(More people complained about those charts than thought them cute.)

[ Parent | on HN ]