News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Ask HN: What scientific phenomenon do you wish someone wo... by cyphar on Monday April 27, 2020 @03:00AM (#22993559)
No it doesn't. You know that the result of the computation for an individual qubit will be either 0 or 1 (otherwise it would be useless -- measuring only gives you one bit of information), so you construct the system such that after the computation is done each qubit will be aligned with the |+z> or whatever axis. The key point is that you have to be clever about how you construct the system for a given QC algorithm, not that you cannot do arbitrary computations using the system.
Re:Ask HN: What scientific phenomenon do you wish someone wo... by elorant on Monday April 27, 2020 @03:10AM (#22993602)
OK but we're back on square one. If you can't read info from qbits without breaking the state of the whole freaking system then what exactly is that you reading? Doesn't the alignment info collapses superposition?
Re:Ask HN: What scientific phenomenon do you wish someone wo... by taejo on Monday April 27, 2020 @03:34AM (#22993734)
You do "break the state of the whole freaking system". Once you've read the output, you're done. You have to set up your initial state again and run the computation from scratch.
Re:Ask HN: What scientific phenomenon do you wish someone wo... by sasaf5 on Monday April 27, 2020 @05:31AM (#22994307)
You design the algorithm so that it collapses the state into the right result.