News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:World Models (the long version) by PeterStuer on Monday April 27, 2020 @10:24AM (#22996087)
Side point on the AWS cost for the project.

Total spend was $3.648 over 11 months. For that amount you can tailor a pretty powerful workstation these days, saving you quite a bit of AWS headaches and overheads (and yes, potentially trading those for others, I know).

Still, this seems like a decent candidate for omitting the cloud as at first sight I do not detect any asks that scream out cloud to me.

Thoughts?

Re:World Models (the long version) by Eridrus on Monday April 27, 2020 @11:00AM (#22996453)
For a hobbyist, you definitely don't want to use the cloud, buy yourself a good GPU (I got a great deal 2nd hand in eBay) and you'll save a lot of cash.

What you need the cloud for is parallelism. If you want to do any sort of hyperparameter tuning doing it on a single computer is going to leave you waiting for days.

Re:World Models (the long version) by ad404b8a372f2b9 on Monday April 27, 2020 @11:00AM (#22996461)
I can't speak to the author's workflow but I also do ML research and I often need heavy bursts of computation with long stretches of nothing in between. So I might spend a few hundred bucks in a couple of days by using multiple very powerful instances at the same time. Even if the cost ends up being the same as a workstation over a year, when it matters the cloud gives me results faster than a workstation would and this enables fast iteration over ideas.
Re:World Models (the long version) by PeterStuer on Monday April 27, 2020 @02:00PM (#22998230)
Bursting is definitely a point. It wasn't clear to me from the data at first glance whether this was used here.
Re:World Models (the long version) by bluetwo on Monday April 27, 2020 @12:56PM (#22997596)
I did appreciate them detailing these costs.
Re:World Models (the long version) by backpropaganda on Monday April 27, 2020 @03:34AM (#22993730)
World Models is a good paper, but is definitely not the top three most significant RL papers.
Re:World Models (the long version) by gas9S9zw3P9c on Monday April 27, 2020 @04:58AM (#22994148)
To be fair, the post does not say that. It says that it's "one of the papers significant to the author" - a subjective ranking.
Re:World Models (the long version) by jefft255 on Monday April 27, 2020 @11:36AM (#22996818)
I loved this paper. It's a good example of a VAE+RNN style model learning for MBRL. It's well exposed. Sure the results aren't the best but it's a well worth read.
Re:World Models (the long version) by Sureai on Monday April 27, 2020 @03:53AM (#22993823)
Which are the top three mist significant RL papers?
Re:World Models (the long version) by johnmoberg on Monday April 27, 2020 @04:00AM (#22993866)
Other than the AlphaZero papers and DQN, maybe TRPO? (assuming we're talking about deep RL)