Re:New Air Force One instruction manuals cost $84M
by voldacar on Sunday April 26, 2020 @11:20PM
(#22992591)
Did you ever experience any times when a part passed the math model, but didn't "look right"?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:New Air Force One instruction manuals cost $84M
by Scramblejams on Monday April 27, 2020 @08:00PM
(#23001720)
BTW, this happens all the time when using structural optimization programs, where you tell the computer what material you're using, how it's constrained and loaded, and then it figures out what it thinks is the optimal shape for the part.
It means somebody left out a load or a constraint, or messed up the material properties, which is all another way of saying the math model is wrong.
So when a part doesn't look right but seems to pass the math, be very suspicious of the math! :-)
Re:New Air Force One instruction manuals cost $84M
by WalterBright on Sunday April 26, 2020 @11:37PM
(#22992671)
Sort of. I spent much time arguing with Stress over how to calculate the torsional rigidity of the elevator structure.
Re:New Air Force One instruction manuals cost $84M
by WalterBright on Sunday April 26, 2020 @11:46PM
(#22992710)
I don't mean to be too hard on Stress. They're good guys, we both had the best interests of the design at heart. Their manager paid me a great compliment by wanting me to join their team. But I liked design work too much.