News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Chernobyl and the Cost of Lies (2019) by trhway on Sunday April 26, 2020 @01:34PM (#22988668)
>a few fringe groups and Greenpeace said 93,000

yep, pretty close. The cancer rates in the Gomel and Mogilev (2 regions where the majority of fallout happened) are significantly higher - like for example breast cancer is about 2 times - and that means several thousands extra deaths per year.

People talking about small/mild background level miss the point of the fallout. It isn't about background level, it is about radioisotopes, especially alpha generating ones, getting inside the body.

Re:Chernobyl and the Cost of Lies (2019) by acidburnNSA on Sunday April 26, 2020 @08:05PM (#22991524)
Citation needed for higher cancer in Gomel being significantly higher because of radioactive fallout from chernobyl causing several thousand extra deaths per year. Got a paper saying that that you could share? I ask because it contradicts what the WHO and UN have been saying for several decades.