Re:What happens when scientists admit error
by brabel on Sunday April 26, 2020 @04:09AM
(#22985467)
> It's great that she did the right thing and had the paper retracted
I'm sorry but you seem to have skipped reading the main part of the article. The paper was not retracted:
"The editor and publisher were understanding and ultimately opted not to retract the paper but to instead publish a revised version of the article, linked to from the original paper, with the results section updated to reflect the true (opposite) results."
I'm sorry but you seem to have skipped reading the main part of the article. The paper was not retracted:
"The editor and publisher were understanding and ultimately opted not to retract the paper but to instead publish a revised version of the article, linked to from the original paper, with the results section updated to reflect the true (opposite) results."