News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:On moving from CouchDB to Riak by grourk on Monday March 07, 2011 @03:23PM (#2298518)
Given that Riak seems to implement buckets "for free" by essentially making them key prefixes under-the-hood, does the bucket name size need to be considered as part of the key size? e.g., if my bucket name is 32 chars and my keys in that bucket are 32 chars, should I be using 64 bytes for average key size?

This is a question I've gotten conflicting answers to.

There are no comments on this comment yet.