News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Libra still needs more baking by ac29 on Sunday April 26, 2020 @01:24AM (#22984729)
> by employing a very strict security regime, they can in principle stay completely anonymous

Doesn't that necessarily require avoiding legitimate financial institutions at all costs?

Re:Libra still needs more baking by lmm on Sunday April 26, 2020 @01:51AM (#22984861)
You can interact with legitimate financial institutions in the normal way under your public identity. You've just got to make sure you don't share that identity with your bitcoin counterparties, which will limit your ability to exchange bitcoin for things of value such as fiat currency.
Re:Libra still needs more baking by garmaine on Sunday April 26, 2020 @02:47AM (#22985103)
Bitcoin isn’t meant to interface with existing financial institutions.
Re:Libra still needs more baking by fidelramos on Sunday April 26, 2020 @04:39AM (#22985602)
Correct. It's actually in the first line of the Bitcoin whitepaper's abstract:

> A purely peer-to-peer version of electronic cash would allow online payments to be sent directly from one party to another without going through a financial institution.

Re:Libra still needs more baking by ac29 on Monday April 27, 2020 @12:33AM (#22992908)
Sure, but effectively 100% of the world's economy takes place via fiat currencies. One could remain anonymous by accumulating a bunch of cash (or gold, or some commodity, etc) and never spending it as well.