News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Comparison of C++17, Go, and Java for a next-generation sequencing tool. Parent comment

Re:Comparison of C++17, Go, and Java for a next-generation s... by movedx on Sunday April 26, 2020 @12:50AM (#22984534)
That being said if the time invested in learning C++ and the extra time needed to write it and optimise it doesn't exceed the performance of the same solution written in (optimised) Go by a factor larger than the time invested then it's not the right choice overall.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Comparison of C++17, Go, and Java for a next-generation s... by cppbert on Monday April 27, 2020 @09:24AM (#22995578)
you are just wrong - someone without any good C++ knowlegde except porting the Java port plain to C++, ported it by using every crude feature and wild combination of shared-ptr, container nesting in a way you will nearly not find in any open source or tutorial project - its not about the ease of go, the the benchmark results are just wrong in so many ways
[ Parent | on HN ]