Re:Preliminary test results suggest 21% of NYC residents hav...
by dboreham on Thursday April 23, 2020 @06:51PM
(#22962488)
That's pretty bad considering only perhaps 5% of the population has been penetrated with covid-19 vs 100% for the flu. Assuming a 70% eventual population infection rate, using your data we should expect to see around 2900 deaths in that age cohort. Annualized flu numbers would be around 500. So covid-19 by your data is 6x more fatal.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Preliminary test results suggest 21% of NYC residents hav...
by mlyle on Thursday April 23, 2020 @06:57PM
(#22962557)
100% of the population was not "penetrated" with the flu between February 1 and now. Evidence implies a similar proportion of the population was "penetrated" with COVID-19 and the flu in that time. This implies a similar death rate for COVID-19 and influenza in those age groups, as the poster said.
Indeed, influenza has been greatly impacted by distancing. The surveillance numbers for influenza are lower than you'll ever see for this time of year.
I can't exclude it's twice as bad as the flu (or half as bad). But even those broadly agree with the poster's statement.