Re:Preliminary test results suggest 21% of NYC residents hav...
by __blockcipher__ on Thursday April 23, 2020 @06:36PM
(#22962361)
We use the term "immunity" but we should remember that there is a difference between the presence of active antibodies and the presence of immune "memory cells". The latter hang around long-term, even if the former disappear. So at a minimum if one does develop infection they will recover far sooner and with better outcomes. And likely will reach a far lower peak viral load which might bring down transmission.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Preliminary test results suggest 21% of NYC residents hav...
by maxerickson on Thursday April 23, 2020 @07:24PM
(#22962795)
That is not well established.
It's likely enough, but we don't gain long term immunity to every virus that we successfully clear.
Re:Preliminary test results suggest 21% of NYC residents hav...
by __blockcipher__ on Thursday April 23, 2020 @09:29PM
(#22963691)
It is well established.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Memory_T_cell
You are conflating active circulating antibodies with the memory T cells. Which is literally what my entire comment was about.
Re:Preliminary test results suggest 21% of NYC residents hav...
by mlyle on Friday April 24, 2020 @12:05PM
(#22969534)
Of course, there's other confounds. Like the somewhat recent discovery that we end up with antigen experience / "memory" of diseases that we've never contracted. (Perhaps from viral fragments in the environment??)