News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:YouTube bans coronavirus-related content that directly co... by EGreg on Thursday April 23, 2020 @06:06PM (#22962105)
That's exactly the problem.

All our politicians around the world were so reactionary, many knew it has a 1-2 week incubation period, but no one was willing to make an order saying "WEAR MASKS" when no one was testing positive yet. They could have gotten ahead of this thing and prevented the outbreaks. The quarantines are a last resort because PUBLIC POLICY FAILED to contain the outbreaks.

WE WILL FACE THIS SITUATION AGAIN when the quarantines are lifted and everyone re-emerges. We must have a clear framework: compulsory wearing of masks and using sanitizer when entering buildings. Fines for anyone caught on camera removing their masks. They have to understand the masks aren't to protect the person wearing them, but the others. It has to be done en masse, and that's what government should be coordinating.

Please watch this video I put together: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ppiPaYI-x4E

Re:YouTube bans coronavirus-related content that directly co... by CamperBob2 on Thursday April 23, 2020 @06:52PM (#22962502)
Obviously it's good advice to wear masks in public when confronted with a respiratory disease capable of asymptomatic transmission for days after infection. The masks don't make any one person safer, but widespread usage makes us all safer.

Trouble is, there weren't enough masks at first. It's not clear that there are now, for that matter.

One of the few things Trump is correct about is that the WHO has bungled this situation at pretty much every step of the way. So no, it's not OK for YouTube to tie their policies to WHO directives. They're a US company, so they should be referring to CDC guidelines (1) instead.

1: https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/prevent-getting-si...

Re:YouTube bans coronavirus-related content that directly co... by SilasX on Thursday April 23, 2020 @07:35PM (#22962897)
There weren’t enough N95 masks. There were plenty of ad hoc/DIY masks.
Re:YouTube bans coronavirus-related content that directly co... by EGreg on Thursday April 23, 2020 @07:56PM (#22963068)
That’s exactly right

There were enough surgical masks

You could double or triple them up if you thought they were not effective enough

The velocity of a particle that could get through that would not be enough to infect a person two feet in front of you

This should be obvious

Re:YouTube bans coronavirus-related content that directly co... by EGreg on Thursday April 23, 2020 @08:29PM (#22963303)
The CDC guidelines you’ve linked to continue to say surgical masks should be for medical personnel.

This is ridiculous!! A mask is a cloth on a string. We are how many months into this thing... why hasn’t our private industry created enough cloths on strings???? What is the shortage? Is it the cloth?

It’s because the politicians were reactionary and behind on the most basic things every step of the way. Why not order American companies to produce a billion masks and mail them to every building in bulk?? Save trillions of dollars later.

Re:YouTube bans coronavirus-related content that directly co... by lemmox on Thursday April 23, 2020 @10:30PM (#22964043)
FWIW I found reading about the process of making respirators quite fascinating. It opened up a whole world of reading about nanofibers and the melt blown process that I'd not previously stumbled upon. Turns out good masks aren't just any old fabric - producing unwoven sub-micron nanofiber fabric is quite involved and that fabric is in short supply.
Re:YouTube bans coronavirus-related content that directly co... by serf on Friday April 24, 2020 @08:36AM (#22967278)
Exactly this. Parent to your comment has no firm grasp on how difficult and expensive it is to place and maintain a melt-blown-fiber shop outside of a crisis, let alone during one.

That said : cotton DIY masks can be quite effective. I recommend buying a box of shop towels, which are made with a similar blowing mechanism that creates a random fiber orientation.

Re:YouTube bans coronavirus-related content that directly co... by CamperBob2 on Thursday April 23, 2020 @09:55PM (#22963841)
The CDC is making a distinction between surgical masks and non-medical grade masks, which is fine. They will both reduce the likelihood that an asymptomatic person will transmit the disease, but the former should be reserved for medical personnel when possible.

The WHO doesn't appear to be drawing any such distinction, at least at first glance.