News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Instagram no longer allows people without an account to v... by svantana on Thursday April 23, 2020 @04:41PM (#22961079)
That's not it, the web interface still works as long as you're logged in, no app needed. My guess is they are sick of scrapers and data miners. If login is needed, they can ban and the proxy hustlers will have a hard time.

FWIW, here in Sweden I can still look at feeds without being logged in.

Re:Instagram no longer allows people without an account to v... by pmontra on Thursday April 23, 2020 @04:47PM (#22961156)
They want people like me to register and increase the user count. I happen to get to an Instagram page once or twice a year following some link, look at a few pictures and quit. I remember it stopped me to scroll through pictures after a while or something like that, again to lure visitors to register. But I don't have a use case for Instagram so I won't. I already send pictures to people I care about via whatsapp.
Re:Instagram no longer allows people without an account to v... by franga2000 on Friday April 24, 2020 @04:46AM (#22965924)
> My guess is they are sick of scrapers and data miners. If login is needed, they can ban and the proxy hustlers will have a hard time.

As someone who's been writing integration (not nefarious!) scrapers for years, this is crap. Email accounts are free, VPNs and captcha solvers are dirt-cheap and at the end of the day, if they screw up the web version too much, the mobile apps are even easier to turn into scrapers as they usually use some kind of JSON API.

They did this for the same reason as Reddit and Facebook: - it's harder to make ad profiles for anonymous users - new users is a metric that investors love - psychological trick (I can't remember what that specific phenomenon is called) to turn lurkers into posters

Re:Instagram no longer allows people without an account to v... by DanBC on Thursday April 23, 2020 @07:09PM (#22962665)
Can you post images using the web interface?