Re:Instagram no longer allows people without an account to v...
by mbreedlove on Thursday April 23, 2020 @02:34PM
(#22959347)
I don't consider anything that's pay-walled to be high quality. If I can't read it, it has no value to me.
Re:Instagram no longer allows people without an account to v...
by duckmysick on Thursday April 23, 2020 @03:18PM
(#22959964)
What do you consider high-quality?
Re:Instagram no longer allows people without an account to v...
by ibero on Thursday April 23, 2020 @02:55PM
(#22959644)
operative word: i.
Re:Instagram no longer allows people without an account to v...
by Wesxdz on Thursday April 23, 2020 @02:58PM
(#22959674)
A lot of search is searcher context sensitive, so I don't think automating this is unreasonable
Re:Instagram no longer allows people without an account to v...
by basch on Thursday April 23, 2020 @03:08PM
(#22959810)
If I continue to run into the same paywall, I would consider buying into it. If I bought content, I would want it to show up in search. I wouldnt know I want to buy it, if I dont run into it first.
Re:Instagram no longer allows people without an account to v...
by nakodari on Thursday April 23, 2020 @08:46PM
(#22963413)
Then Google should work on a way to connect your purchase with their system or give you ability to inform them you’ve purchased a subscription so that only you get to see search results from that paywalled website, and not others.
However, I do think some kind of tag, similar to [AD] could appear next to the result, warning you not to click it, [PW] or [LW] for paywall and loginwall.