Re:This must be Google's Facebook clone. It sure looks like it.
by alastair on Sunday March 06, 2011 @07:28PM
(#2295491)
IIRC I think google ran the wave project kind of like this, and look how that turned out.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:This must be Google's Facebook clone. It sure looks like it.
by megablast on Sunday March 06, 2011 @08:40PM
(#2295640)
That is a pretty silly thing to say. My buddies business failed, and they used computers, so therefore nobody should use any computers to start a business anymore.
Re:This must be Google's Facebook clone. It sure looks like it.
by stan_rogers on Sunday March 06, 2011 @07:43PM
(#2295520)
The problem with Wave wasn't that it missed its target as much as it was that the folks who "got" what Wave was about were largely the same folks who were already using Lotus Notes/Domino to its full advantage. I've worked in shops where people lived in Notes, and in shops where people lived in email in Notes, and there's a vast difference between using an integrated collaboration environment and messaging links and attachments back and forth.
It's funny, in a way, that people have a hard time putting the pieces together. They seem to "get" email, instant messaging, publicly editable documents, wikis, blogs, "related links" sidebars and so on...
Re:This must be Google's Facebook clone. It sure looks like it.
by stevenj on Sunday March 06, 2011 @07:59PM
(#2295555)
Often times, I think the best products have an objective feel to them. So in the case of Wave, I'd say that its creator didn't have a clear understanding of what they wanted, or they were "commissioned" by Google to make it, in which case Google was the maker and should have been very closely involved in its development.