News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Mental Model Fallacy (2018) by mistermann on Wednesday April 22, 2020 @07:58PM (#22951454)
That may (how shall we know?) have been the point they intended to make, but the statement we have to work with is: "Any field of knowledge that has been dissected into a taxonomy must be dead."

Is there some nuance of uncertainty in there I'm not picking up on?

Re:Mental Model Fallacy (2018) by inimino on Wednesday April 22, 2020 @10:08PM (#22952186)
The word "dissected" is doing a lot of work there. "Any" makes it, arguably, hyperbolic. Obviously we can't take too literally any statement about a field being alive or dead. Research is alive in these fields but pedagogy is mostly not.
Re:Mental Model Fallacy (2018) by clairity on Thursday April 23, 2020 @12:18PM (#22957593)
ah, can we know anything at all then? can any statement, no matter how forcefully and obviously effused, be absolutely uncertain?

but i digress... as fun as the debate may be, hn is probably not where we solve epistemic dilemmas.

Re:Mental Model Fallacy (2018) by mistermann on Saturday April 25, 2020 @09:11PM (#22983299)
Well,we can put a man on the moon with less computing power than we carry in our pocket, and that's far from the most impressive thing we've accomplished in a long long list.

> hn is probably not where we solve epistemic dilemmas.

The repulsion to things like logic and epistemology on a programming website isn't the type of thing I believe we should strive for or celebrate, but I certainly can't disagree with your assessment.