Re:Getting Started With Dgraph and GraphQL+
by h0l0cube on Tuesday April 21, 2020 @12:05AM
(#22931747)
> No need for a separate abstraction on top of it
I'm guessing the abstraction has now been internalized. Unless the representation and operations underneath have been customized, and provide the same transaction guarantees and parsimony that a native graph database would for graph operations.
I'm guessing the abstraction has now been internalized. Unless the representation and operations underneath have been customized, and provide the same transaction guarantees and parsimony that a native graph database would for graph operations.