News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Who’s behind the “reopen” domain surge? by jimkleiber on Monday April 20, 2020 @11:49PM (#22931660)
Twitter got sued back in the day by Tony LaRussa, former coach of the St. Louis Cardinals, for letting people impersonate his account—and thus the verified blue check was born.

So now impersonation is just getting more nuanced, on Twitter, FB, DNS, Skype, Zoom, robocalls, Tinder, you name it.

If someone impersonates someone in person in the US, it’s probably a fine or an arrest. If someone does it on the internet, well, more often than not we can’t tell and even if we do know who did it, we may try them in the US but if outside, not much of a chance.

Why do you think we haven’t demanded that tech companies and governments solve this problem?

Re:Who’s behind the “reopen” domain surge? by zo1 on Tuesday April 21, 2020 @09:39AM (#22934841)
> Why do you think we haven’t demanded that tech companies and governments solve this problem?

Privacy is almost always the answer to that one. Either that, or "to protect people from totalitarian governments". Honestly, I understand that, but I'm disappointed that no one goes further and says "Hey, let's see if we can solve both problems at the same time whilst maintaining security and privacy."

Re:Who’s behind the “reopen” domain surge? by specialist on Tuesday April 21, 2020 @10:47AM (#22935363)
Easy solution.

Verified works get signed by their content maker.

Tony LaRussa is verified. Twitter issues him a cert. All of Tony LaRussa's works are signed with that cert.

Revoke the cert if there's ever a problem. Not really Tony LaRussa. Someone hacks his accounts. He passes away. Etc.

Unsigned works still permitted. But everyone knows no one claims the work as their own.

Re:Who’s behind the “reopen” domain surge? by nradov on Tuesday April 21, 2020 @12:22AM (#22931842)
It is generally not illegal to impersonate someone. You will only be fined or arrested if there is an actual crime involved, like fraud.