News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Shirt Without Stripes by acdha on Monday April 20, 2020 @10:31PM (#22931239)
Google has for years put out puff pieces talking about high accuracy on image tagging. It’s only within the last few months that searching my Photos library for “cat” returned something other than pictures of my dog.

There’s a nuanced argument that practitioners know how ML is so dependent on training data and accuracy tails off sharply, but that nuance tends to removed from anything selling to potential customers — which has not been a great way to keep them in my experience.

Re:Shirt Without Stripes by fyfy18 on Monday April 20, 2020 @11:50PM (#22931665)
I'd assume pets are hard as there are so many varieties (potentially even harder than humans). For the last few years Google Photos has correctly returned photos for a search of "Lamborghini" in my albums. I'd expect "shirt stripes" to fall into that category.
Re:Shirt Without Stripes by acdha on Tuesday April 21, 2020 @09:23AM (#22934710)
Sure, I’m not saying it’s an easy problem — just that the marketing is once again setting the field up for failure by giving the impression of human-level performance but delivering results only in very narrow scenarios.