Oil plunges below zero for first time with May contract ending

Re:Oil plunges below zero for first time with May contract e... by missedthecue on Monday April 20, 2020 @11:45AM (#22924915)

Yes, but a very very low percentage of the contracts that expire result in delivery. Delivery is expensive. It's cheaper to get oil through a supplier.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Oil plunges below zero for first time with May contract e... by frankchn on Monday April 20, 2020 @12:04PM (#22925141)

That’s true but not really relevant here. if traders are holding on to any open contracts for May past tomorrow, then I believe they will have to take physical delivery.

Thus, traders who still have contracts open but cannot take physical delivery will have to close their positions out today or tomorrow, thus causing the dip we are seeing.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Oil plunges below zero for first time with May contract e... by pas on Monday April 20, 2020 @02:30PM (#22926818)

Are there market makers for those contracts? (So can they sell them at all?)

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Oil plunges below zero for first time with May contract e... by mlrtime on Monday April 20, 2020 @04:44PM (#22928312)

Of course there are market makers, but they aren't going to buy contracts if they can't deliver.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Oil plunges below zero for first time with May contract e... by pas on Tuesday April 21, 2020 @08:44AM (#22934417)

Okay, but isn't the point of designated market makers to always provide liquidity?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Oil plunges below zero for first time with May contract e... by whatok on Monday April 20, 2020 @11:53AM (#22924993)

The percentage of contracts that result in delivery is only a marginal factor in this case. The fact that physical delivery exists makes it so that positions must be closed out; even if the May contract is down 44% on the day and you thought you would be clever buying the dip on Friday when oil couldn't possibly go lower.

[ Parent | on HN ]