News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:In South Korea, a Protester’s Lone Fight Against Samsung by maallooc on Sunday April 19, 2020 @11:07PM (#22920784)
I have but they are all Korean.
Re:In South Korea, a Protester’s Lone Fight Against Samsung by robjan on Sunday April 19, 2020 @11:22PM (#22920853)
Can still post them. We have Google translate.
Re:In South Korea, a Protester’s Lone Fight Against Samsung by maallooc on Monday April 20, 2020 @05:40AM (#22922440)
http://news.khan.co.kr/kh_news/khan_art_view.html?art_id=201...

The paper that says he did not sexually assult the woman is clearly not notarized, as you can see on the photo provided by him.

http://www.labortoday.co.kr/news/articleView.html?idxno=1468...

He alleges that his attorney did not submit the notarized paper. He says that he lost his appeal because of it. His attorney was Moon Jae-In, who happens to be the current sitting president of South Korea which started his term in 2017.

He was fired from Samsung in 1995, but his radical protest started in 2018. Coincidence?

About the sexual assult, you can see that it's all her allegations. It's a shame it's copyrighted so I can't share the article but you can buy a page of The Busan Paper, 1992/May/25 23p.

Re:In South Korea, a Protester’s Lone Fight Against Samsung by rajlego on Monday April 20, 2020 @01:43AM (#22921442)
Better to post them than have unsubstantiated claims.
Re:In South Korea, a Protester’s Lone Fight Against Samsung by hatsunearu on Monday April 20, 2020 @02:49AM (#22921729)
And I can read them too lol
Re:In South Korea, a Protester’s Lone Fight Against Samsung by tareqak on Monday April 20, 2020 @02:59AM (#22921776)
Please send them to the New York Times.
Re:In South Korea, a Protester’s Lone Fight Against Samsung by tareqak on Monday April 20, 2020 @08:19AM (#22923189)
I can’t edit this anymore, but I should have said to post them here, and to send them to the New York Times. My mistake.
Re:In South Korea, a Protester’s Lone Fight Against Samsung by maallooc on Monday April 20, 2020 @06:16AM (#22922596)
I expected the quality so I'm happy with them. "alleged" "attempted" sexual assult. 33% fact hit rate? That's pretty good.