News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Evidence SARS-CoV-2 Emerged from a Biological Laboratory in Wuhan, China. Parent comment

Re:Evidence SARS-CoV-2 Emerged from a Biological Laboratory ... by DoingIsLearning on Friday April 17, 2020 @08:26AM (#22898382)
> What direct evidence do we have for the 'wet market' theory that is currently most widely accepted?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Evidence SARS-CoV-2 Emerged from a Biological Laboratory ... by jacquesm on Friday April 17, 2020 @10:27AM (#22899229)
A couple of million years of Zoonotic events should count as pretty good evidence that that is how these things happen.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Evidence SARS-CoV-2 Emerged from a Biological Laboratory ... by DoingIsLearning on Friday April 17, 2020 @02:59PM (#22901831)
True, but then for that to be consistent, the epicenter around patient zero should have been next to a habitat where a large pool of this virus exist. However the closest matched virus seems to be carried by a species of bat that doesn't exist anywhere near the region of Wuhan. But coincidentally, if we trust the facts brought forward by this repo, was a species that was studied in these virology labs.
[ Parent | on HN ]