Where does the website say this? It is quite vague about implementation details, at least from what I can find.

Closest I could find was a conspiracy theory linking a separate study into using quantum dots to record vaccination. https://stm.sciencemag.org/content/11/523/eaay7162

It is not a microchip, but not a conspiracy theory either:

http://news.mit.edu/2019/storing-vaccine-history-skin-1218

"Funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and the Koch Institute "

Thankfully this won't fly in Germany, because the Nazis tattooed concentration camp victims with numbers. Not sure about the U.S. though.

This is exactly the kind of thing the lunatic militias in the 90s were terrified about. Those people are still around, and if you try to give them 'the mark of the beast', for better or worse, there will be blood.

But it is an invisible, beneath the skin imprint, and for a good reason to help with large scale vaccination. And without such vaccination, especially in the case of covid-19, millions could die. Who would argue with such a beneficial and convenient approach?

However, for some reason ID2020 is distancing themselves from this quantum dot approach.

https://www.factcheck.org/2020/04/conspiracy-theory-misinter...

"The Gates Foundation has advocated for expanded testing and has funded vaccine research, but neither of those involves implanted microchips."

Technically true. Quantum dots aren't exactly microchips.