10-core i9-10900F desktop CPU lags behind 8-core Ryzen 9 4900HS mobile APU

Re:10-core i9-10900F desktop CPU lags behind 8-core Ryzen 9 ... by piinbinary on Thursday April 16, 2020 @12:00PM (#22890727)

It is worth noting that this is the i9-10900F, not the i9-10900k (thank you, Intel, for the lovely naming scheme). I'd expect the -k variant to be at least as fast as the i9-9900k.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:10-core i9-10900F desktop CPU lags behind 8-core Ryzen 9 ... by Tempest1981 on Thursday April 16, 2020 @12:14PM (#22890850)

Also, 9900 was much easier to say... how do you pronounce 10900? "Ten-thousand-nine-hundred"? Feels tortured. "Ten-nine-hundred"? Yeesh.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:10-core i9-10900F desktop CPU lags behind 8-core Ryzen 9 ... by charwalker on Thursday April 16, 2020 @12:21PM (#22890936)

Ten-Nine Hundred is what I've seen on YouTube recently and I like it.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:10-core i9-10900F desktop CPU lags behind 8-core Ryzen 9 ... by Avery3R on Thursday April 16, 2020 @02:40PM (#22892192)

It works semantically too. You say the generation first, then the specific model within that generation.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:10-core i9-10900F desktop CPU lags behind 8-core Ryzen 9 ... by jandrese on Thursday April 16, 2020 @01:47PM (#22891774)

Ten Nine Hundred scans much better. I'd expect it to be what people settle on. Sort of like the Lockheed L Ten Eleven.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:10-core i9-10900F desktop CPU lags behind 8-core Ryzen 9 ... by taikawatiti on Thursday April 16, 2020 @12:35PM (#22891086)

Tenty nine hundred duh

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:10-core i9-10900F desktop CPU lags behind 8-core Ryzen 9 ... by derefr on Thursday April 16, 2020 @01:34PM (#22891662)

Does Intel ever even use those last two zeroes, or could we start leaving them off and calling this part the "one oh nine"?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:10-core i9-10900F desktop CPU lags behind 8-core Ryzen 9 ... by nuclear_eclipse on Thursday April 16, 2020 @02:22PM (#22892051)

They definitely use them, but less often on the i9 series since there isn't a lot of options in that range.

Compare 10th gen i9 to i7:

https://ark.intel.com/content/www/us/en/ark/products/series/...

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:10-core i9-10900F desktop CPU lags behind 8-core Ryzen 9 ... by beervirus on Thursday April 16, 2020 @05:50PM (#22893929)

On a related note, how do people pronounce the Intel 8088?

Eight oh eight eight? Eighty eighty eight?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:10-core i9-10900F desktop CPU lags behind 8-core Ryzen 9 ... by leetcrew on Thursday April 16, 2020 @12:47PM (#22891221)

good point, I was confusing the F-suffix with the KF-suffix parts, which usually perform identically to K-suffix parts.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:10-core i9-10900F desktop CPU lags behind 8-core Ryzen 9 ... by belltaco on Thursday April 16, 2020 @12:06PM (#22890786)

Not sure how that will matter, F just means there are no integrated graphics. Why would that impact performance compared to a i9-9900 ?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:10-core i9-10900F desktop CPU lags behind 8-core Ryzen 9 ... by piinbinary on Thursday April 16, 2020 @12:12PM (#22890832)

I believe the K variant also has a higher base clock (3.7 vs. 3.2)

[ Parent | on HN ]