News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The Guile in TeXmacs (2019) [pdf] by mgubi on Thursday April 16, 2020 @06:41AM (#22888023)
It does not. I used it every day for academic research. Most of my papers converts right away to TeX for publications. Of course your have to collaborate with similarly minded people. But sometimes I just write my part in TeXmacs and then copy and paste in the collaborative LaTeX file. YMMV. And you can use it to do online lecture (not quite like LyX) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KyVc6wKE8Oc
Re:The Guile in TeXmacs (2019) [pdf] by azalemeth on Thursday April 16, 2020 @08:35AM (#22888706)
How well does the reverse process work? If your collaborators make changes to the TeX, is there a way to sync the two together?

We tend to use git repos + XeLaTeX in my group.

Re:The Guile in TeXmacs (2019) [pdf] by mgubi on Thursday April 16, 2020 @08:45AM (#22888785)
Back and forth conversion is not fully supported, we try to have good match (see e.g. https://www.texmacs.org/joris/latexconv/latexconv.pdf ). TeXmacs has its own format, so no: you cannot collaborate with people which want to edit LaTeX files. But you can convince them to use TeXmacs. :) I've never regretted. I go back to LaTeX sometimes but most of my documents are now created in TeXmacs. If you need a tool to collaborate then use things like Lyx or TeXstudio, etc... We had to get away from TeX to remove the intrinsic limitations of that technology. There is not much you can you if you want to stick to complete TeX compatibility.